From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 2/2 rc8-omap-git] twl4030-core irq simplification
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:43:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810062043.35080.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Simplify twl4030 IRQ handling by removing a needless custom flow
handler. The top level IRQs, from the PIH, are well suited for
handle_simple_irq() ... they can't be acked or masked.
Switching resolves some issues with how IRQs were dispatched.
Notably, abuse of desc->status, IRQ accounting, and handling
of various faults.
In short, use standard genirq code.
Drivers that request_irq() to the PIH will need to pay more
attention to things like setting IRQF_DISABLED (since it's
no longer ignored), and making I2C calls from handlers (you'll
need a lockdep workaround).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
---
Tested with the updated TWL GPIO and pwrirq drivers (now using
handle_edge_irq). It should behave without those updates, too.
drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c | 75 ++-----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
@@ -535,68 +535,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(twl4030_i2c_read_u8);
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-/*
- * do_twl4030_module_irq() is the desc->handle method for each of the twl4030
- * module interrupts that doesn't chain to another irq_chip (GPIO, power, etc).
- * It executes in kernel thread context. On entry, cpu interrupts are disabled.
- */
-static void do_twl4030_module_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc)
-{
- struct irqaction *action;
- const unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- /*
- * Earlier this was desc->triggered = 1;
- */
- desc->status |= IRQ_LEVEL;
-
- /*
- * The desc->handle method would normally call the desc->chip->ack
- * method here, but we won't bother since our ack method is NULL.
- */
-
- if (!desc->depth) {
- kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq]++;
-
- action = desc->action;
- if (action) {
- int ret;
- int status = 0;
- int retval = 0;
-
- local_irq_enable();
-
- do {
- /* Call the ISR with cpu interrupts enabled */
- ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
- if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
- status |= action->flags;
- retval |= ret;
- action = action->next;
- } while (action);
-
- if (status & IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM)
- add_interrupt_randomness(irq);
-
- local_irq_disable();
-
- if (retval != IRQ_HANDLED)
- printk(KERN_ERR "ISR for TWL4030 module"
- " irq %d can't handle interrupt\n",
- irq);
-
- /*
- * Here is where we should call the unmask method, but
- * again we won't bother since it is NULL.
- */
- } else
- printk(KERN_CRIT "TWL4030 module irq %d has no ISR"
- " but can't be masked!\n", irq);
- } else
- printk(KERN_CRIT "TWL4030 module irq %d is disabled but can't"
- " be masked!\n", irq);
-}
-
static unsigned twl4030_irq_base;
static struct completion irq_event;
@@ -611,7 +549,6 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data
static unsigned i2c_errors;
const static unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
- daemonize("twl4030-irq");
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
@@ -691,8 +625,7 @@ static struct task_struct * __init start
struct task_struct *thread;
init_completion(&irq_event);
- thread = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq,
- "twl4030 irq %ld", irq);
+ thread = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq, "twl4030-irq");
if (!thread)
pr_err("%s: could not create twl4030 irq %ld thread!\n",
DRIVER_NAME, irq);
@@ -1126,7 +1059,7 @@ static void twl_init_irq(int irq_num, un
/* install an irq handler for each of the PIH modules */
for (i = irq_base; i < irq_end; i++) {
set_irq_chip_and_handler(i, &twl4030_irq_chip,
- do_twl4030_module_irq);
+ handle_simple_irq);
activate_irq(i);
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-07 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 3:43 David Brownell [this message]
2008-10-07 8:59 ` [patch 2/2 rc8-omap-git] twl4030-core irq simplification Tony Lindgren
2008-10-07 9:18 ` David Brownell
2008-10-07 9:53 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810062043.35080.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox