From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com>,
"Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto" <saaguirre@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] twl4030: Fix pwrirq by making sure the module is responding (Re: kernel oops for 3430sdp)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:19:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810081219.49296.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081008183808.GA31385@atomide.com>
On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Well, there does seem to be an issue where the "pending IRQ" mechanism
> > can leave a PWRIRQ.PWRON interrupt pending sometimes. If you see a
> > bunch of alarming-but-harmless boot messages like
> >
> > TWL4030 module irq 373 is disabled but can't be masked!
> >
> > before pwrirq registers, that seems to be the issue. A debug hack I
> > applied (appended) reported that the mask (IMR) was 0xff but the IRQ
> > was still being raised ... when pwrirq registered itself, the stream
> > of those messages stopped. (Or, when this hack dumped the status and
> > thus kicked in clear-on-read ...)
>
> Hmm, maybe there's some status register for each modules that should be
> checked?
I think this was just a natural consequence of PENDDIS=0 in the
SIH_CTRL register. A minor annoyance in the init sequence since
it causes extra IRQs, but nothing significant.
I haven't come across a TWL register that could explain I2C
timeouts. At least, not yet.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 18:07 kernel oops for 3430sdp Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2008-10-07 18:28 ` David Brownell
2008-10-07 19:29 ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2008-10-07 20:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-10-08 14:55 ` [PATCH] twl4030: Fix pwrirq by making sure the module is responding (Re: kernel oops for 3430sdp) Tony Lindgren
2008-10-08 18:05 ` David Brownell
2008-10-08 18:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-08 19:19 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-10-08 19:36 ` David Brownell
2008-10-08 21:36 ` [PATCH 2.6.27-rc9-omap] i2c-omap: timeouts begone David Brownell
2008-10-08 21:54 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-10-08 22:35 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-10-10 11:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-10-08 23:38 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-10-09 1:09 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810081219.49296.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
--cc=saaguirre@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox