From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch FYI] twl4030 dumps revision info Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:16:58 -0700 Message-ID: <200810161716.58536.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200810152123.42459.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.184]:28550 "HELO smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752142AbYJQARB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:17:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Pandita, Vikram" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Thursday 16 October 2008, Pandita, Vikram wrote: > >The main curiousity we've uncovered is that TWL5030 ES1.0 > >mis-identifies itself as TWL4030 ES1.0 ... unclear just now > >whether that's also true of ES1.1 and later parts. > > As per TRM, > the idcode for TWL5030 should be: 0x0009802F > > is it not what you are observing? Or was it the , bug !! On one part labeled tps65950, it was 00009002F. On one labeled as a twl5030, ditto. On one labeled as a twl4030, it was 5009002f. Ergo the observation that the TWL5030 ES1.0 parts seem to mis-identify themselves. - Dave