From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] OMAP2/3 omapdev: add basic omapdev structure Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:26:27 -0700 Message-ID: <200810230026.27666.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20081018215247.9699.35039.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20081018215908.9699.79756.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.94]:26036 "HELO smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751275AbYJWJEs (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:04:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081018215908.9699.79756.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 18 October 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote: > In the medium- to long-term, it may be best > to use a generic device pointer so system devices can be linked also; Best IMO to start phasing out system devices; they're superfluous, given some power management changes from late last year.