From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
To: ext Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-omap: Don't wait needlessly
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:17:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081024131740.64641d26.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12246059481717-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@nokia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1531 bytes --]
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:19:08 +0300
"ext Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@nokia.com> wrote:
> /* timeout waiting for the controller to respond */
> #define OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(1000))
> +/* no more busyloop in ns */
> +#define OMAP_I2C_MINOR_TIMEOUT 10
>
> #define OMAP_I2C_REV_REG 0x00
> #define OMAP_I2C_IE_REG 0x04
> @@ -255,6 +257,8 @@ static int omap_i2c_init(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
> unsigned long internal_clk = 0;
>
> if (!dev->rev1) {
> + int delay = 0;
> +
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_SRST);
> /* For some reason we need to set the EN bit before the
> * reset done bit gets set. */
> @@ -262,6 +266,14 @@ static int omap_i2c_init(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
> while (!(omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSS_REG) &
> OMAP_I2C_SYSS_RDONE)) {
> + if (delay < OMAP_I2C_MINOR_TIMEOUT) {
> + ndelay(1);
> + delay++;
> + continue;
> + } else if (delay == OMAP_I2C_MINOR_TIMEOUT) {
> + dev_warn(dev->dev, "minor timeout not enough");
> + delay++;
> + }
> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> dev_warn(dev->dev, "timeout waiting "
> "for controller reset\n");
>
I would rather, if there is no need for such a long delay like
OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT, remove that time_after and msleep(1) stuff and
just loop few iterations with udelay(1). Zero thinked & tested diff
attached.
I would say that ndelay(1) just doesn't look relevant to < 1 GHz
cpus :-)
Jarkko
[-- Attachment #2: hack.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 766 bytes --]
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -248,16 +248,16 @@ static int omap_i2c_init(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_SRST);
/* For some reason we need to set the EN bit before the
* reset done bit gets set. */
- timeout = jiffies + OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT;
+ timeout = 10;
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
while (!(omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSS_REG) &
OMAP_I2C_SYSS_RDONE)) {
- if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ udelay(1);
+ if (--timeout) {
dev_warn(dev->dev, "timeout waiting "
"for controller reset\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- msleep(1);
}
}
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-21 16:19 [RFC] i2c-omap: Don't wait needlessly Sakari Ailus
2008-10-24 10:17 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2008-10-27 16:20 ` Sakari Ailus
2008-11-21 21:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-11-25 9:35 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081024131740.64641d26.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox