* Tony Lindgren [081031 12:21]: > In the case of spurious interrupt, the handler for previous irq most likely > needs a read back of some register to ensure write posting. Here's a better version to kill the checkpatch.pl warning. Later on we might want to add also a check for "irq == 95" to the test in omap_mask_irq() so we can keep this patch around with minimal overhead. Tony