public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Peter de Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP3 clock: avoid invalid FREQSEL values during DPLL rate rounding
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:52:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112185101.31228.30241.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081112183754.31228.73844.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

The DPLL FREQSEL jitter correction bits are set based on a table in
the 34xx TRM, Table 4-38, according to the DPLL's internal clock
frequency "Fint."  Several Fint frequency ranges are missing from this
table.  Previously, we allowed these Fint frequency ranges to be
selected in the rate rounding code, but did not change the FREQSEL bits.
Correspondence with the OMAP hardware team indicates that Fint values
not in the table should not be used.  So, prevent them from being
selected during DPLL rate rounding.  This removes warnings and also
can prevent the chip from locking up.

The first pass through the rate rounding code will update the DPLL max
and min dividers appropriately, so later rate rounding passes will run
faster than the first.

Peter de Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> put up with several
test cycles of this patch - thanks Peter.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Peter de Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c             |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.h         |    1 
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.h         |    5 ++
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/clock.h |    1 
 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
index bd3be45..42af286 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
@@ -61,6 +61,16 @@
 #define DPLL_ROUNDING_VAL		((DPLL_SCALE_BASE / 2) * \
 					 (DPLL_SCALE_FACTOR / DPLL_SCALE_BASE))
 
+/* DPLL valid Fint frequency band limits - from 34xx TRM Section 4.7.6.2 */
+#define DPLL_FINT_BAND1_MIN		750000
+#define DPLL_FINT_BAND1_MAX		2100000
+#define DPLL_FINT_BAND2_MIN		7500000
+#define DPLL_FINT_BAND2_MAX		21000000
+
+/* _dpll_test_fint() return codes */
+#define DPLL_FINT_UNDERFLOW		-1
+#define DPLL_FINT_INVALID		-2
+
 /* Some OMAP2xxx CM_CLKSEL_PLL.ST_CORE_CLK bits - for omap2_get_dpll_rate() */
 #define ST_CORE_CLK_REF			0x1
 #define ST_CORE_CLK_32K			0x3
@@ -114,6 +124,51 @@ static void _omap2_clk_write_reg(u32 v, u16 reg_offset, struct clk *clk)
 		cm_write_mod_reg(v, clk->prcm_mod, reg_offset);
 }
 
+/*
+ * _dpll_test_fint - test whether an Fint value is valid for the DPLL
+ * @clk: DPLL struct clk to test
+ * @n: divider value (N) to test
+ *
+ * Tests whether a particular divider @n will result in a valid DPLL
+ * internal clock frequency Fint. See the 34xx TRM 4.7.6.2 "DPLL Jitter
+ * Correction".  Returns 0 if OK, -1 if the enclosing loop can terminate
+ * (assuming that it is counting N upwards), or -2 if the enclosing loop
+ * should skip to the next iteration (again assuming N is increasing).
+ */
+static int _dpll_test_fint(struct clk *clk, u8 n)
+{
+	struct dpll_data *dd;
+	long fint;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	dd = clk->dpll_data;
+
+	/* DPLL divider must result in a valid jitter correction val */
+	fint = clk->parent->rate / (n + 1);
+	if (fint < DPLL_FINT_BAND1_MIN) {
+
+		pr_debug("rejecting n=%d due to Fint failure, "
+			 "lowering max_divider\n", n);
+		dd->max_divider = n;
+		ret = DPLL_FINT_UNDERFLOW;
+
+	} else if (fint > DPLL_FINT_BAND1_MAX &&
+		   fint < DPLL_FINT_BAND2_MIN) {
+
+		pr_debug("rejecting n=%d due to Fint failure\n", n);
+		ret = DPLL_FINT_INVALID;
+
+	} else if (fint > DPLL_FINT_BAND2_MAX) {
+
+		pr_debug("rejecting n=%d due to Fint failure, "
+			 "boosting min_divider\n", n);
+		dd->min_divider = n;
+		ret = DPLL_FINT_INVALID;
+
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
 
 /**
  * omap2_init_clk_clkdm - look up a clockdomain name, store pointer in clk
@@ -943,7 +998,14 @@ long omap2_dpll_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long target_rate)
 
 	dd->last_rounded_rate = 0;
 
-	for (n = DPLL_MIN_DIVIDER; n <= dd->max_divider; n++) {
+	for (n = dd->min_divider; n <= dd->max_divider; n++) {
+
+		/* Is the (input clk, divider) pair valid for the DPLL? */
+		r = _dpll_test_fint(clk, n);
+		if (r == DPLL_FINT_UNDERFLOW)
+			break;
+		else if (r == DPLL_FINT_INVALID)
+			continue;
 
 		/* Compute the scaled DPLL multiplier, based on the divider */
 		m = scaled_rt_rp * n;
@@ -977,7 +1039,7 @@ long omap2_dpll_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long target_rate)
 			pr_debug("clock: found new least error %d\n", min_e);
 
 			/* We found good settings -- bail out now */
-			if (min_e <= clk->dpll_data->rate_tolerance)
+			if (min_e <= dd->rate_tolerance)
 				break;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.h
index 8bf70cf..1fc1249 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.h
@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll_dd = {
 	.idlest_reg		= CM_IDLEST,
 	.idlest_mask		= OMAP24XX_ST_CORE_CLK_MASK,
 	.max_multiplier		= 1024,
+	.min_divider		= 1,
 	.max_divider		= 16,
 	.rate_tolerance		= DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.h
index 08789c8..0b95fcb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.h
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll1_dd = {
 	.idlest_mask	= OMAP3430_ST_MPU_CLK_MASK,
 	.bypass_clk	= &dpll1_fck,
 	.max_multiplier = OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_MULT,
+	.min_divider	= 1,
 	.max_divider	= OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_DIV,
 	.rate_tolerance = DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
@@ -367,6 +368,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll2_dd = {
 	.idlest_mask	= OMAP3430_ST_IVA2_CLK_MASK,
 	.bypass_clk	= &dpll2_fck,
 	.max_multiplier = OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_MULT,
+	.min_divider	= 1,
 	.max_divider	= OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_DIV,
 	.rate_tolerance = DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
@@ -429,6 +431,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll3_dd = {
 	.idlest_mask	= OMAP3430_ST_CORE_CLK_MASK,
 	.bypass_clk	= &sys_ck,
 	.max_multiplier = OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_MULT,
+	.min_divider	= 1,
 	.max_divider	= OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_DIV,
 	.rate_tolerance = DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
@@ -594,6 +597,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll4_dd = {
 	.idlest_mask	= OMAP3430_ST_PERIPH_CLK_MASK,
 	.bypass_clk	= &sys_ck,
 	.max_multiplier = OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_MULT,
+	.min_divider	= 1,
 	.max_divider	= OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_DIV,
 	.rate_tolerance = DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
@@ -920,6 +924,7 @@ static struct dpll_data dpll5_dd = {
 	.idlest_mask	= OMAP3430ES2_ST_PERIPH2_CLK_MASK,
 	.bypass_clk	= &sys_ck,
 	.max_multiplier = OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_MULT,
+	.min_divider	= 1,
 	.max_divider	= OMAP3_MAX_DPLL_DIV,
 	.rate_tolerance = DEFAULT_DPLL_RATE_TOLERANCE
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/clock.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/clock.h
index 9088925..4eef580 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/clock.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/clock.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct dpll_data {
 	unsigned long		last_rounded_rate;
 	unsigned int		rate_tolerance;
 	u16			max_multiplier;
+	u8			min_divider;
 	u8			max_divider;
 	u32			max_tolerance;
 	u16			idlest_reg;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-12 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-12 18:50 [PATCH 0/3] OMAP3 clock: skip reserved FREQSEL settings Paul Walmsley
2008-11-12 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3 clock: remove unnecessary dpll_data dereferences Paul Walmsley
2008-11-12 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] OMAP3 clock: optimize DPLL rate rounding algorithm Paul Walmsley
2008-11-12 18:52 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
2008-11-21 22:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] OMAP3 clock: skip reserved FREQSEL settings Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081112185101.31228.30241.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox