From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.28-rc2-omap 0/5] legacy gpio phaseout (II) ... Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:39:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20081113213914.GF3106@atomide.com> References: <200810300031.42711.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:58467 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751497AbYKMVjS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:39:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810300031.42711.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * David Brownell [081030 00:38]: > Second set, plus the first of Jarkko's: > > - OMAP tree > * use gpio_direction_output() > * use gpio_to_irq() > - Mainline *and* OMAP trees: > * use gpio_direction_output(), remove the legacy version > * use gpio_to_irq() > * make legacy gpio_request()/gpio_free() calls superfluous > > These go on top of the preceding four. > > Merging these will facilitate for example a mach-omap2/gpio.c file > that is much nicer since it's not full of OMAP1 support... Pushing today and adding to omap-upstream queue. Tony