From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:08:10 -0800 Message-ID: <200811141208.10600.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <12266521173159-git-send-email-ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com> <200811141145.30171.david-b@pacbell.net> <20081114200214.GA31944@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.92]:23318 "HELO smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752335AbYKNUIN (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:08:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081114200214.GA31944@frodo> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: me@felipebalbi.com Cc: ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Friday 14 November 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:45:30AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > And should it let at least some boards talk to their > > TWL chips at 3.4 MBit/sec (top speed for standard > > highspeed I2C) instead of 2.6 Mbit/sec (pokey slow)? > > I've always wondered why all the boards configured > > those links to be seemingly slower than allowed ... > > I think it came from board-3430sdp.c So you're saying there was *never* a need for that slowdown, and everyone was just copying an existing buglet? I know I didn't make time to test whether faster speeds would work ... but had expected there was a reason, at some point, for that detuning. > All other board files are based on that so is kind of a brainless > change. > > Just change a few stuff in the MACHINE_START and some function names. > Remove some unneded functions and that's about it ;-)