From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: MCSPI: Enable mcspi wake-up v2. Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:40:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20081126224011.GI11997@atomide.com> References: <873ahotc5t.fsf@trdhcp146196.ntc.nokia.com> <1227080924-11555-1-git-send-email-jouni.hogander@nokia.com> <20081126175709.GS11997@atomide.com> <200811261041.02375.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:52800 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbYKZWkN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:40:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811261041.02375.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: Jouni Hogander , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * David Brownell [081126 10:41]: > On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Jouni Hogander [081118 23:48]: > > > Currently mcspi wake-ups are not enabled. This might cause case where > > > OMAP is not waking up on mcspi events. > > > > Dave, I assume you're picking these for your SPI queue? Will only > > apply to l-o if you ack and tell me so. > > OK... I'm not totally caught up there. Is this needed for > a 2.6.28-final merge? I'm guessing not; so it'd be OK to > queue for 2.6.29-final and have it in l-o until 29-rc1 gets > pulled down. Yes 2.6.29 timeline sounds fine to me at least. I'll apply these to l-o then. Tony