From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-omap2 tag?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:07:31 -0800
Message-ID: <20081210170731.GD26387@atomide.com>
References: <8bf247760812100529p7b7c1505ufdb0564b3547a4b0@mail.gmail.com> <94a0d4530812100540t7b2ff0efh5f8b6379e08d2168@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:57263 "EHLO
	mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752871AbYLJRHd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:07:33 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530812100540t7b2ff0efh5f8b6379e08d2168@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Sriram V <vshrirama@gmail.com>, "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>

* Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> [081210 05:40]:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Sriram V <vshrirama@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  Is there a Linux-2.6.27-omap2 tag somewhere?
> 
> No, probably because 2.6.27-omap1 is good enough.

Yeah there was no need to do 2.6.27-omap2 this time.

Tony