From: "Juha Yrjölä" <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>
To: Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215134010.GA10709@mail.solidboot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229342896-7363-1-git-send-email-ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:08:16PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add new function omap_update_gpio_switch() to support dynamically
> changing the GPIO switch notify callback functions and debounce
> timeouts.
Why do they need to be changed? GPIO switches related to the board schematics,
which do not hopefully change dynamically.
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sw->lock, flags);
> if (state)
> timeout = sw->debounce_rising;
> else
> timeout = sw->debounce_falling;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sw->lock, flags);
What's the point of this? The above read can be consider an atomic operation.
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sw->lock, flags);
> + notify = sw->notify;
> + notify_data = sw->notify_data;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sw->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (notify != NULL)
> + notify(notify_data, state);
What if omap_update_gpio_switch() is called just before the check for
notify != NULL from another (hypothetical =)) CPU? Then you end up with the
function completing, but still having the old notify callback called with
old notify_data.
Cheers,
Juha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-15 12:08 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 12:14 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-15 13:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:44 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 13:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:40 ` Juha Yrjölä [this message]
2008-12-15 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 15:29 ` Juha Yrjölä
2008-12-15 15:58 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-16 6:05 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-18 11:42 ` GPIO switch framework (was: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update) Jani Nikula
2008-12-18 13:00 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-18 13:40 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-19 8:47 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-19 8:51 ` Brian Swetland
2008-12-21 20:26 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081215134010.GA10709@mail.solidboot.com \
--to=juha.yrjola@solidboot.com \
--cc=ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox