From: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
To: Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jani Nikula" <ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com>,
"ext Juha Yrjölä" <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: GPIO switch framework (was: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:51:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081219085127.GB1530@bulgaria.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d5443650812190047u7c22ff96y2f4503827075ea43@mail.gmail.com>
Definitely worth discussing -- I'm going to be out of the office for two
weeks over the holidays, and most of the rest of our team is on vacation
as well. I'll pass this on, but I'm not sure if people will have much
time to take a look before January.
[Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@gmail.com>]
> Hi Jani,
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jani Nikula
> <ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 18:30 +0530, ext Trilok Soni wrote:
> >
> >> Why limit to GPIO based switches only? GPIOs should be client of
> >> switch framework I think, and how h/w implements that switch should be
> >> hidden by client specific driver.
> >
> > You're quite right, it's better not to make such unnecessary
> > limitations. All the more reason to discuss before anyone submits a
> > truckload of patches for review. :)
>
> Let me CC Brian from Android here.
>
> Brian, we are discussing here of making generic switch framework and
> android-kernel also have near to generic switch fwk implementation, so
> that we can combine the linux-omap gpio switch fwk ideas and android
> one to create generic switch framework.
>
> For complete thread information, please start from this link:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg07845.html
>
> --
> ---Trilok Soni
> http://triloksoni.wordpress.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-15 12:08 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 12:14 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-15 13:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:44 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 13:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-12-15 13:40 ` Juha Yrjölä
2008-12-15 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-15 15:29 ` Juha Yrjölä
2008-12-15 15:58 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-16 6:05 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-18 11:42 ` GPIO switch framework (was: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Add support for dynamic GPIO switch update) Jani Nikula
2008-12-18 13:00 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-18 13:40 ` Jani Nikula
2008-12-19 8:47 ` Trilok Soni
2008-12-19 8:51 ` Brian Swetland [this message]
2008-12-21 20:26 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081219085127.GB1530@bulgaria.corp.google.com \
--to=swetland@google.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com \
--cc=juha.yrjola@solidboot.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soni.trilok@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox