Re: lowmemory android driver not needed?

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:02:48PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:32:38PM -0800, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >> >> We actually use 6 different thresholds for killing processes. I don't
> >> >> know what all the classes are, processes with a higher oom_adj value
> >> >> can be killed with less impact to the user than processes with a lower
> >> >> oom_adj value. The first few classes only affect latency when
> >> >> switching apps, but later classes stop non critical background
> >> >> services and finally the foreground app. Another reason to not kill
> >> >> every process at the same threshold is that memory may not be free
> >> >> immediately when the process is killed.
> >> >
> >> > But the lowmemorykiller android module doesn't have anything to do with
> >> > this, right?
> >> >
> >>
> >> It does. We write the thresholds to
> >> /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj and
> >> /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree then set the oom_adj
> >> value per process. If the standard oom killer can be adjusted in a
> >> similar way, then we will not need the lowmemorykiller module.
> >
> > Great, care to document this somewhere so people like me don't get
> > confused?
> 
> And there is one more lowmem driver developed by Nokia for Nokia 8xx
> tablets it seems. CCed Tony Lindgren,  Juha and Viktor.
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;a=blob;f=security/lowmem.c;h=ae78a530af39703e335ad769f1e6f097f63ec6dd;hb=HEAD

As we can't stack LSMs, using the lsm interface for a simple memory
driver seems pretty wasteful :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html