From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compile error in usb-musb.c Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:41:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20090116224111.GD8189@frodo> References: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02E6815B88@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <200901161327.52661.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090116221920.GC8189@frodo> <200901161431.00469.david-b@pacbell.net> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:51122 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759510AbZAPWlU (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:41:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901161431.00469.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, Tony Lindgren , "Gadiyar, Anand" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:31:00PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:27:52PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > So why not just enable PM=y in the configuration? It's not > > > actually required to do much, beyond not being broken. > > > > That patch would have to go through tony > > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h: > > > > #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX) > > #error "Power management for this processor not implemented yet" > > #endif > > I didn't realize anyone outside of TI had their hands > on OMAP4 chips yet. :) hehe, the last line isn't in mainline ;-) -- balbi