Re: OMAP1: mcbsp clocks

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [090123 09:43]:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:17:28PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Basically we currently cannot use virtual clocks because of this
> > and the fact that the parent of the virtual clock may not be known
> > as pointed out by Paul Walmsley.
> 
> One other thing I'd like to confirm is how the kernel treats the OMAP5912.
> OMAP5912 is interesting to me at the moment because it seems that all
> the information on it is freely available.  I don't know about the
> others.
> 
> However, it would be useful to know how the kernel treats this - iow,
> which of the four categories for OMAP1 SoCs - 310, 730, 1510, 1610.

5912 = 1611b = 16xx. Then 1710 is quite similar.

> Of course, if someone knows (or can send me, maybe Richard W?) where
> there's a similar document to spru751a for the clock architecture for
> these other CPUs (and OMAP2420, OMAP2430, OMAP3430, etc) it would be
> most useful.

I have some links on my webpage to the docs:

http://www.muru.com/linux/omap/

Still no public docs for 24xx :(

Tony