From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH D 11/11] Fix omap1 clock issues Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:37:33 +0000 Message-ID: <20090129143733.GB18233@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090128191638.16688.33452.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090128191844.16688.39372.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090128191844.16688.39372.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:18:48PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > From: Tony Lindgren > > This fixes booting, and is a step toward fixing things properly: > > - Make enable_reg u32 instead of u16 No, you're passing this to __raw_read/write, so it needs to be void __iomem *, not u32. If there's another patch doing that it needs to be combined with this one. The miniscule details of fixes upon fixes aren't interesting for submission purposes, and just adds extra unnecessary review load for upstream people. Ditto for anything else which is passed to __raw_read/write*.