From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] per board prm timings Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:24:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20090213102430.GA4582@codecarver.research.nokia.com> References: <1234281875-19768-1-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> <1234281875-19768-2-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> <87d4dnpmxq.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134]:51349 "EHLO mgw-mx09.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750797AbZBMKYi (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:24:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d4dnpmxq.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Kevin Hilman Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Hi Kevin, > Peter, > > I like this approach much better than what we currently have. Pushing > to PM branch. > > The next thing I would like to see is all the register value defines > removed from prm-regbits-34xx.h. That header is supposed to be for > the bitfield definitions, not for values. > True. If this patch goes in, there is no need for the register value defines in prm-regbits-34xx.h any more. Cheers, Peter. -- goa is a state of mind