From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Otto Solares Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Allow I2C_OMAP to compile as a module. Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:56 -0600 Message-ID: <20090217235956.GL24800@guug.org> References: <20090213085827.d516d6aa.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> <20090213222100.GJ7562@atomide.com> <20090215213559.0a6653a1.jhnikula@gmail.com> <20090215214501.c7386464.jhnikula@gmail.com> <499996EC.4030108@nokia.com> <20090217112513.303d62e6.jhnikula@gmail.com> <20090217235018.GF11928@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from guug.org ([200.9.255.30]:59803 "EHLO guug.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751034AbZBQX75 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:59:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090217235018.GF11928@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Aaro, can you please send a proper patch with Signed-off-by and I'll > add it to omap-fixes? Tony: what's the purpose of omap-fixes and the difference between master and omap-2.6.28? if I want a "stable" kernel which branch should I use? Thanks. -otto