From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: ehci-omap patches (Was Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RESEND] lm8323 patches) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20090220133005.GP16942@scadufax.research.nokia.com> References: <20090220125109.GL16942@scadufax.research.nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02F565683F@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:42707 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751855AbZBTNqH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:46:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02F565683F@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "ext Gadiyar, Anand" Cc: "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , Grazvydas Ignotas , "me@felipebalbi.com" , Steve Sakoman , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Anand Gadiyar wrote: > That's not true. I do care. It __is__ important to me that OMAP support goes > to mainline. And I do not like it that it hasn't happened yet. Sorry. > > What happened with EHCI here is kind of similar to what you've done with MUSB patches recently anyway. sure... but then Dave helped right... We had some discussions off list in order for that to happen. > > Well, I'm not here to flood the list discussing this kinds of > > issues with you. > > Standard behavior for you. That's the way you end all discussions that go > beyond 5 mails! yeah... for sure. If you wanna keep discussing it, just keep sending your mails... -- balbi