From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: ehci-omap patches (Was Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RESEND] lm8323 patches) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20090222165056.GA2135@frodo> References: <20090220125109.GL16942@scadufax.research.nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02F565683F@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <94a0d4530902220551x62dfeb8w248528922afbcd8c@mail.gmail.com> <57969b5c0902220759n55798b71y64a5b17b7bdc7f98@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:57219 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754242AbZBVQvL (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:51:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57969b5c0902220759n55798b71y64a5b17b7bdc7f98@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Anand Gadiyar Cc: Felipe Contreras , "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" , Grazvydas Ignotas , "me@felipebalbi.com" , Steve Sakoman , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap Hi, not trying to keep the thread alive, but... On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:29:30PM +0530, Anand Gadiyar wrote: > Then I suggest you read up the history. You __are__ misinterpreting > this. He did not submit any patches. He had a list of some tens of > drivers that he was planning to send to mainline sometime last > September. I thought I'll save everyone some time and would take care http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=122124472931396&w=2 I've even mailed you and/or Vikram 4 patches on ehci for you make your patches on top of them. (can't really remember if you or Vikram was working on that driver at that time) > of sending in at least the EHCI part so he could concentrate on other > stuff that he was doing. Unfortunately, I got preempted more than > once. heh, I know how that feels... -- balbi