From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
Ajay Kumar Gupta <ajay.gupta@ti.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
felipe.balbi@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: musb: fix bug in musb_start_urb
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:05:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902231405.42762.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498C515B.20603@ru.mvista.com>
On Friday 06 February 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote:
>
> > urb->transfer_buffer_length and urb->transfer_buffer should be
> > updated based on urb->actual_length.For a fresh and first time urb,
> > actual_length will be zero but for urbs which has been stopped and
> > restarted (as bulk nak scheme does) actual_length may not be zero.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta <ajay.gupta@ti.com>
>
> NAK, this is not a problem for the current driver since URBs do not ever
> get restarted.
Resolvable by changing the patch description to not say
this is a "fix".
However, since this is a two line change, I think I'll
just merge this with the patch adding the bulk RX retry
logic.
> Also, musb_host_tx() doesn't update urb->actual_length --
> please fix it too.
That would be a good point if the retry patch touched
any TX paths. But it doesn't.
> Also, you must not clear qh->iso_idx when restarting -- you
> must not start ISO transfer all over again too. Also, you should not set
> musb->ep0_state to MUSB_EP0_START again in this case (I agree that control
> transfers will remain not restartable from an arbitatry place even then).
But the [3/3] patch only adds NAK timeout support for
bulk RX. And ISO transfers can't NAK in the first place.
Plus, as noted in a comment you could see in this patch,
this only touches (re)start for bulk/interrupt transfers.
Not ISO; not control.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 11:52 [PATCH 2/3] usb: musb: fix bug in musb_start_urb Ajay Kumar Gupta
[not found] ` <1233921146-4046-1-git-send-email-ajay.gupta-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-06 15:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-02-23 22:05 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-02-24 15:50 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902231405.42762.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=ajay.gupta@ti.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox