From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juha Yrjola Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: SDTI: Prevent access to sdti writing if module is not initialized. Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20090302113112.GA15810@mail.solidboot.com> References: <1234438768-20697-1-git-send-email-roman.tereshonkov@nokia.com> <20090216113303.GL21181@scadufax.research.nokia.com> <20090227183524.GI11594@atomide.com> <20090227190053.GH16801@frodo> <20090228100855.GA10606@mail.solidboot.com> <20090302082750.GC24691@pure.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from solidboot.com ([92.48.122.80]:37262 "EHLO rei.solidboot.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752415AbZCBLbP (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 06:31:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090302082750.GC24691@pure.research.nokia.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Lauri Leukkunen Cc: Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , "Tereshonkov Roman (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Lauri Leukkunen wrote: > > STI console is enabled based on runtime decisions by the bootloader. The > > kernel command line is unusable for us, because there is no way to append to > > the line. We don't want to remove the possibility how having the user > > create a custom kernel with a custom command line. > > *I* don't have a problem with having the bootloader always define the > cmdline, you are the one against it :) If we did that, how would the kernel flashing process go? Cheers, Juha