From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc8 regulator-next] regulator: init fixes (v4) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:02:14 -0700 Message-ID: <200903181402.14384.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200903111743.34708.david-b@pacbell.net> <200903181225.11444.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090318203317.GA6299@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp123.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.96]:41524 "HELO smtp123.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755867AbZCRVCR (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090318203317.GA6299@sirena.org.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Liam Girdwood , lkml , OMAP On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > The $SUBJECT patch will prevent such things from existing. > > I sent a patch backing that specific change out along with the > late_initcall() patch. Huh? $SUBJECT patch hasn't merged. How could you have backed it out?? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123707714131036&w=2 I didn't see such patches. Could you post URLs so I know specifically what you're referring to? In the future, when you're proposing patches you think address bugs I've reported, please remember to CC me ...