From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Kernel support of the Zoom OMAP35X Development kit Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:52:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20090325185257.GS8057@atomide.com> References: <49CA662B.6000104@balister.org> <1f11a5490903251020o40ec542dyd44a2098c273a211@mail.gmail.com> <20090325173341.GP8057@atomide.com> <1f11a5490903251053v7f797a45i5509d1c965683e36@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:54751 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027AbZCYSxD (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:53:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f11a5490903251053v7f797a45i5509d1c965683e36@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Ashwin Bihari Cc: Philip Balister , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" * Ashwin Bihari [090325 10:53]: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Ashwin Bihari [090325 10:21]: > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > >> > I looked at the kit kernel and didn't see support for this board: > >> > > >> > http://www.logicpd.com/products/devkit/ti/zoom_omap3_development_kit > >> > > >> > What are my chances getting this board going with the Linux-omap git kernel? > >> > > >> > If that doesn't work, what boards give easy access to the GPMC pins and work > >> > with the linux-omap kernel? > >> > > >> > Philip > >> > > >> > >> Philip, > >> > >> We have support for the OMAP3530LV_SOM (the LogicPD DevKit in the > >> link) on 2.6.28-rc8. We have patches available against that particular > >> release of the Linux OMAP tree and that'll get you up to speed on the > >> SOM to do your work. Register yourself on the website and you should > >> get access to the patches there. > > > > How about send the board-*.c and other patches you have against the > > mainline kernel to this list so we can review them? > > > > Then let's queue them up for integration to the mainline kernel for > > the next merge window! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tony > > > > Tony, > > We're trying to move our stuff forward to the 2.6.29 tree and there's > probably more value in submitting patches against that as opposed to > 2.6.28.. Yes, please do the patches against the 2.6.29 mainline kernel. Tony