From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>,
"George G. Davis" <gdavis@mvista.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/58] move omap_wdt's probe function to .devinit.text
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:15:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090329181528.GA25077@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090329180912.GA6979@infomag.iguana.be>
Hi Wim,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:09:12PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> > A pointer to omap_wdt_probe is passed to the core via
> > platform_driver_register and so the function must not disappear when the
> > .init sections are discarded. Otherwise (if also having HOTPLUG=y)
> > unbinding and binding a device to the driver via sysfs will result in an
> > oops as does a device being registered late.
> >
> > An alternative to this patch is using platform_driver_probe instead of
> > platform_driver_register plus removing the pointer to the probe function
> > from the struct platform_driver.
>
> Agree with the explanation, but ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > index 2f2ce74..c9c14dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static const struct file_operations omap_wdt_fops = {
> > .release = omap_wdt_release,
> > };
> >
> > -static int __init omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int __devinit omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct resource *res, *mem;
> > struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev;
>
> ...imho this would be the correct fix:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> index aa5ad6e..f271385 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static const struct file_operations omap_wdt_fops = {
> .release = omap_wdt_release,
> };
>
> -static int __init omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __devinit omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct resource *res, *mem;
> struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev;
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void omap_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> omap_wdt_disable(wdev);
> }
>
> -static int omap_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __devexit omap_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int omap_wdt_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static struct platform_driver omap_wdt_driver = {
> .probe = omap_wdt_probe,
> - .remove = omap_wdt_remove,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(omap_wdt_remove),
> .shutdown = omap_wdt_shutdown,
> .suspend = omap_wdt_suspend,
> .resume = omap_wdt_resume,
Your change is OK, but only "my" part is an important fix. With
omap_wdt_probe being defined with __init your kernel can oops.
omap_wdt_remove only occupies memory for too long if defined without
__devexit. That's why I only fixed the first part (with the remove
functions on my todo list though).
Grüßle
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090327232153.GA16348@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1238196439-16535-35-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
2009-03-29 18:09 ` [PATCH 35/58] move omap_wdt's probe function to .devinit.text Wim Van Sebroeck
2009-03-29 18:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090329181528.GA25077@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=gdavis@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox