From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: green Subject: Re: n800 build error in clock24xx.c: 'secure_32k_ck' undeclared Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:23:36 -0600 Message-ID: <20090420012336.GE1736@swansys> References: <873ac7ko2n.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <20090419050020.GC1736@swansys> <87prf8skiq.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6" Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:62158 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753478AbZDTBk4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:40:56 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so753138qwd.37 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87prf8skiq.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Content-Language: en Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kalle Valo wrote at 2009-04-19 09:58 -0600: > green writes: >=20 > > Kalle Valo wrote at 2009-04-17 14:44 -0600: > > > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c: In function 'sys_oabi_epoll_wait': > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:289: error: implicit declaration of = function 'kmalloc' > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:289: warning: assignment makes point= er from integer without a cast > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:302: error: implicit declaration of = function 'kfree' > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c: In function 'sys_oabi_semtimedop': > >> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:325: warning: assignment makes point= er from integer without a cast > > > > I see nearly the same: > > > > arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c: In function =E2=80=98sys_oabi_epoll_= wait=E2=80=99: > > arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:288: error: implicit declaration of f= unction =E2=80=98kmalloc=E2=80=99 > > arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:288: error: =E2=80=98GFP_KERNEL=E2=80= =99 undeclared (first use in this function) >=20 > I think that's the same error. Most probably my tree was dirty and > that's the line numbers are different. I was noticing the 'GFP_KERNEL' undeclared error rather than the line numbe= rs. --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknrzpgACgkQ682C+dBP+oSWyQCgz6vJMfL0DOhVOEANahBJpFL/ QpgAn1DXGHROhve8IRaQqN+7QsWi7ryF =+kEl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6--