From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] omap3-iommu: reorganize Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:03:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20090518130305.GE3067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1242468350-23190-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1242468350-23190-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20090518120717.GA3067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <94a0d4530905180559k4b3e13e9xd947ae8cb8849b66@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:56386 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbZERNDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 09:03:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530905180559k4b3e13e9xd947ae8cb8849b66@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Contreras Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Hiroshi DOYU , Hari Kanigeri , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, Felipe Contreras On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > So resource_size_t is ok for 'base'? Yes.