From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:54:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528155431.GC32453@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090528152517.GB20736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [090528 08:25]:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:23:06PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Use processor specific defines instead.
> >
> > As an extra bonus, this patch fixes the problem of CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> > calling sched_clock before we have things initialized:
>
> Hmm. I don't think sched_clock peculiarities should be handed by the
> clock source implementation.
>
> This is really a generic kernel bug: lots of ARM architecture sched_clock
> implementations can not be called before things like IO memory has been
> setup - and that's something that mainline people have been made aware
> of repeatedly, and they've fixed the problems when they've come up.
Yeah agreed.
> Moreover, the issue of using clocksources for sched_clock is being
> discussed on the main ARM lists, with the possibility of the generic
> kernel-wide sched_clock implementation being based upon clock sources.
>
> Whether that changes anything with this patch, I'm not entirely sure.
The clocksource and sched_clock thing is a separate issue, this patch
is still needed to remove the conflicting defines.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 23:21 [PATCH 0/5] More omap header clean-up for the merge window after 2.6.30 Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-28 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-05-28 15:54 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2009-05-14 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP_PRM_REGADDR and OMAP2_PRM_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Move define of OMAP2_VA_IC_BASE to be local to entry-macro.S Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_PRCM_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP_CM_REGADDR Tony Lindgren
2009-05-19 17:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] More omap header clean-up for the merge window after 2.6.30 Tony Lindgren
2009-05-28 15:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07 20:42 [PATCH 0/5] More header clean-up Tony Lindgren
2009-05-07 20:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090528155431.GC32453@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox