From: Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com>
To: Tero.Kristo@nokia.com
Cc: khilman@deeprootsystems.com, paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:23:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906091023.59112.jpihet@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1F18D6510CF0474A8C9500565A7E41A2054552C767@NOK-EUMSG-02.mgdnok.nokia.com>
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 10:14:58 Tero.Kristo@nokia.com wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ext Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@deeprootsystems.com]
> >Sent: 08 June, 2009 20:24
> >To: Jean Pihet
> >Cc: Paul Walmsley; Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere); linux-omap
> >Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects
> >
> >Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com> writes:
> >> On Monday 08 June 2009 16:59:36 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >>> Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com> writes:
> >>> > Paul,
> >>> >
> >>> > Here is the updated patch that fixes the Overo build as well.
> >>> > Can you check it?
> >>> >
> >>> > Kevin, can you push it if it is correct?
> >>>
> >>> Can you run it through checkpatch, fix the errors and also merge
> >>> Tero's
> >>> RX51 patch if it looks good to you.
> >>
> >> Ok. I will check. The cause might be the mailer.
> >>
> >> I think we need the omap_cfg_reg calls in the RX51 board
> >
> >file as well,
> >
> >> even if the bootloader has the mux setting already right. That way a
> >> warning will be issued in case of a faulty bootloader. Do you agree?
> >
> >I agree.
>
> Well, this is ok for me too as it does not really change anything. I will
> voice my opinion here though. :)
>
> I find it somewhat weird that we take care of two pads in this fashion out
> of ~350 or so, where in most cases we just assume that the pads are
> configured properly by the boot loader. Should we do the same for every
> pad?
Got your point. This omap_cfg_reg throws a warning if the pad is incorrectly
configured. The goal is to better track the problem in case of a wrong/older
bootloader. In the ideal world the bootloader and kernel should match and do
it all right!
> Does the kernel even boot if the CKE signals are configured
> incorrectly? I would guess the boot loader will fail to load the kernel
> image into SDRAM in that case.
The kernel boots fine in that case, only the SDRAM contents are not preserved
when going to low power mode.
>
> -Tero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 13:53 Beagleboard rev C memory timings & suspend/resume Jean Pihet
2009-05-06 23:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-05-07 11:18 ` Jean Pihet
2009-05-07 16:44 ` Jean Pihet
2009-05-07 18:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-05-08 7:05 ` Jean Pihet
2009-05-08 22:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-05-11 19:10 ` Jean Pihet
2009-05-11 20:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-05-26 13:27 ` [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects (was: Re: Beagleboard rev C memory timings & suspend/resume) Jean Pihet
2009-06-02 23:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-06-03 7:03 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-05 15:35 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-05 18:10 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-06-08 7:37 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-06-08 8:59 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-08 14:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-08 17:08 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-08 17:23 ` [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects Kevin Hilman
2009-06-09 8:14 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-06-09 8:23 ` Jean Pihet [this message]
2009-06-09 8:29 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-06-09 7:26 ` [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects (was: Re: Beagleboard rev C memory timings & suspend/resume) Paul Walmsley
2009-06-05 19:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-06-06 10:50 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2009-06-08 9:02 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-08 11:01 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2009-06-08 17:11 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-08 17:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects Kevin Hilman
2009-05-07 19:18 ` Beagleboard rev C memory timings & suspend/resume Paul Walmsley
2009-05-08 8:13 ` Jean Pihet
2009-05-08 22:51 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906091023.59112.jpihet@mvista.com \
--to=jpihet@mvista.com \
--cc=Tero.Kristo@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox