From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Kucheria Subject: Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:11:37 +0300 Message-ID: <20090617141137.GJ6374@everest> References: <1245238182-11697-1-git-send-email-amit.kucheria@verdurent.com> <4A38F387.1050502@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f212.google.com ([209.85.220.212]:47212 "EHLO mail-fx0-f212.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764316AbZFQORp (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:17:45 -0400 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so338264fxm.37 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A38F387.1050502@gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Eugeny S. Mints" Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 09 Jun 17, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Amit Kucheria wrote: >> Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power >> functionality will follow directly to lkml. >> >> > development against upstream is great. But what will be left for > this mail list if we send all patches directly to lkml? I think the idea is that (and Tony should correct me here if I'm wrong) core OMAP code is handled here while peripheral drivers will all go directly to their respective susbsystem maintainers upstream. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amit Kucheria, Kernel Developer, Verdurent -------------------------------------------------------------------------