From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:56:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20090617145652.GC10550@sirena.org.uk> References: <1245238182-11697-1-git-send-email-amit.kucheria@verdurent.com> <4A38F387.1050502@gmail.com> <20090617140648.GT6605@atomide.com> <4A38FBA8.8090406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:44765 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbZFQO4x (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:56:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A38FBA8.8090406@gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Eugeny S. Mints" Cc: Tony Lindgren , Amit Kucheria , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:20:24PM +0400, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Tony Lindgren wrote: >> Anything touching arch/arm/*omap*. > I'm not sure how many non-omap based boards out there are using twl4030 > chip and if a separate mfd mail list exists. > But until any of the above is true I personally feel that twl4030 > related discussions naturally fall into omap mail list. While the overwhelming majority of TWL4030 specifics will only actually be seen on OMAP systems (so CCing the OMAP list makes sense) the code also exists in the context of the rest of the kernel. It needs review by subsystem maintainers and people working on non-OMAP systems may have useful input based on their general experience of working on simiar parts - in general Linux terms the fact that you've got, for example, a keyboard controller is at least as relevant as the fact that it's likely to be used on an OMAP system. Many subsystems don't have a separate list and just use linux-kernel.