From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Cc: Ryan <ryanphilips19@googlemail.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git tree
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:40:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625144048.GU7352@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FCCFB4CDC6E5564B9182F639FC35608702F546277D@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
* Pandita, Vikram <vikram.pandita@ti.com> [090625 17:08]:
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >* Ryan <ryanphilips19@googlemail.com> [090624 12:42]:
> >> Hi,
> >> Looking at the linux-omap tree using the gitweb interface. Apart
> >> from the "master" branch and tags.
> >> why do we have lots of branches? How and when do they intertact with
> >> each other.
> >>
> >> Can anyone explain what exactly goes into each of them?
> >> Some are straight forward like pm, usb, tidspbridge, gateway. not sure
> >> about for-next-2.6.30, omap-fixes.
> >
> >More or less the various branches are topic branches of patches
> >going to the mainline kernel. For example, omap-fixes contains fixes to
> >be sent during the -rc cycle, omap-upstream contains omap common patches
> >for the next merge window, omap1-upstream omap1 specific patches for
> >the next merge window and so on.
> >
> >The master branch is more or less merge of all the topic branches.
> >Currently missing from it are the pm branch and the dss2 branch.
> >
> >> Trying to understand things/mode of development in here.
> >
> >Hope this helps. In general, your should now be able to do almost
> >all the patches against Linus' mainline kernel. Of course until
> >we get pm and dss2 into the mainline kernel, those patches need to
> >be done against pm and dss2 branches.
> >
> >So everybody, where possible, please base all the patches against
> >Linus' kernel stable something or -rc someting, that way they are
> >easy to merge in.
>
> Are you recommending that future patches posted to l-o list should be based of kernel.org
> and not master of l-o?
Yeah, for all the patches that do not have dependencies to other topic
branches such as pm, dss2.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 9:34 git tree Ryan
2009-06-24 11:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-06-25 14:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
2009-06-25 14:40 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-30 12:14 Luís Vitório Cargnini
2007-07-30 12:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2007-07-17 11:41 Git tree Veda N
2007-07-17 12:03 ` Trilok Soni
2007-07-25 15:15 ` Maximus
2006-07-13 22:41 Luís Cargnini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090625144048.GU7352@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryanphilips19@googlemail.com \
--cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox