From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT][PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: McSPI Support for OMAP_4430 Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:39 +0300 Message-ID: <20090626055038.GV7352@atomide.com> References: <51412.192.168.10.89.1245911089.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com> <873a9os1nr.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:59029 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751432AbZFZFul (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:50:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Kevin Hilman , "Syed, Rafiuddin" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" * Shilimkar, Santosh [090626 08:00]: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org > > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman > > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:15 PM > > To: Syed, Rafiuddin > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT][PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: McSPI Support for OMAP_4430 > > > > "Syed Rafiuddin" writes: > > > > > This patch adds McSPI support for OMAP4430 SDP platform. > > All the base addresses > > > are changed between OMAP1/2/3 and OMAP4.The fields of the > > resource structures > > > are filled at runtime to have McSPI support on OMAP4. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Syed Rafiuddin > > > > This driver needs some help for multi-omap, but that problem existed > > before this patch, so > > > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > > > > > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c | 10 ++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > Not sure but looks like the patch needs split since different upstream paths > 1. arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c -- linux-arm > 2. drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c --- Don't know the list but should be some driver list. > > Is that correct ? I think this is OK to send as a single patch via the SPI list. Acked-by: Tony Lindgren