From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net"
<oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: get_irq_regs() from soft IRQ
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:37:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629173757.GC9042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906291936.57703.siarhei.siamashka@nokia.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:36:57PM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> On Monday 29 June 2009 17:31:18 ext Jean Pihet wrote:
> > I am trying to get the latest IRQ registers from a timer or a work queue
> > but I am running into problems:
> > - get_irq_regs() returns NULL in some cases, so it is unsuable and even
> > causes crash when trying to get the registers values from the returned ptr
> > - I never get user space registers, only kernel
> >
> > The use case is that the performance unit (PMNC) of the Cortex A8 has some
> > serious bug, in short the performance counters overflow IRQ is to be
> > avoided. The solution I am implementing is to read and reset the counters
> > from a work queue that is triggered by a timer.
>
> Regarding this oprofile related part. I wonder how you can get oprofile
> working properly (providing non-bogus results) without performance
> counters overflow IRQ generation?
I don't think you can - triggering capture on overflow is precisely how
oprofile works.
The erratum talks about polling for overflow. By doing this, you are in
a well defined part of the kernel, which is obviously going to be shown
as a hot path for every counter, thus making oprofile useless for kernel
work.
Deferring the interrupt to a workqueue doesn't resolve the problem either.
The problem has nothing to do with what happens after the interrupt
occurs - it's about interrupts themselves being lost.
I think just accepting that this erratum breaks oprofile is the only
realistic solution. ;(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 14:31 get_irq_regs() from soft IRQ Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 15:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-06-29 15:35 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-06-29 16:12 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 16:36 ` Siarhei Siamashka
2009-06-29 16:58 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-06-29 17:57 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 17:54 ` Siarhei Siamashka
2009-06-29 18:08 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 17:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2009-06-29 17:52 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 18:38 ` Siarhei Siamashka
2009-06-29 18:49 ` Jean Pihet
2009-06-29 19:45 ` Siarhei Siamashka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629173757.GC9042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jpihet@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=siarhei.siamashka@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox