From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:20:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20090724092034.GB27429@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E739404329D66BE@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20090720121157.GA13867@nokia.com> <20090720121526.GB5215@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:36944 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbZGXJUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:20:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Felipe Balbi , "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" , "david-b@pacbell.net" , "Nayak, Rajendra" On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:46:27AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > Mark, Liam, > Can you please your comments of regulator patches. I'd really like to see the ifdefs go as someone else requested earlier in the thread. Allowing both twl4030 and twl6030 support to be built simultaneously is much nicer from a maintinance perspective and will scale better as further devices are added to the family.