From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>,
"Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"khilman@deeprootsystems.com" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"david-b@pacbell.net" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090803142534.GB4265@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB02B5BF2678@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:45:58AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> Can you please provide your comments on the v2 version of the patches in which Balaji has fixed the "ifdef's"
They're basically OK from a regulator API point of view but the series
appears to depend on the renaming patch and possibly some others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 11:59 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-20 12:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-07-20 12:15 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-20 13:00 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-24 4:16 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-07-24 9:20 ` Mark Brown
2009-08-03 6:15 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-03 14:25 ` Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-20 13:34 Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-06 8:58 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-11 13:00 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17 0:00 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-08-17 5:16 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17 9:14 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-08-17 9:42 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090803142534.GB4265@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox