From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:25:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20090803142534.GB4265@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E739404329D66BE@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20090720121157.GA13867@nokia.com> <20090720121526.GB5215@sirena.org.uk> <20090724092034.GB27429@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:57918 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755047AbZHCOZf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:25:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Felipe Balbi , "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" , "david-b@pacbell.net" , "Nayak, Rajendra" On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:45:58AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > Can you please provide your comments on the v2 version of the patches in which Balaji has fixed the "ifdef's" They're basically OK from a regulator API point of view but the series appears to depend on the renaming patch and possibly some others.