From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: TWL4030 IRQ
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:36:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090803163611.GB28606@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248674448-17495-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Hi Santosh,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:30:48AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> (Rebased on 2.6.31-rc4)
>
> The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It is
> calling the 'unmask' function in a process context. :The mask/unmask/ack
> functions are only designed to be called from the IRQ handler code,
> or the proper API interfaces found in linux/interrupt.h.
>
> Also there is no need to have IRQ chaining mechanism. The right way to
> handle this is to claim the parent interrupt as a standard interrupt
> and arrange for handle_twl4030_pih to take care of the rest of the devices.
I'd like this one to be split in 2 different patches as you're addressing 2
different issues here.
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Mail thread on this issue can be found at:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=124629940123396&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
> index bae61b2..7d43083 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
> @@ -180,14 +180,9 @@ static struct completion irq_event;
> static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
> {
> long irq = (long)data;
> - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> static unsigned i2c_errors;
> static const unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
>
> - if (!desc) {
> - pr_err("twl4030: Invalid IRQ: %ld\n", irq);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
>
> current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
>
> @@ -240,7 +235,7 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
> }
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> + enable_irq(irq);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -255,25 +250,13 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
> * thread. All we do here is acknowledge and mask the interrupt and wakeup
> * the kernel thread.
> */
> -static void handle_twl4030_pih(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +static irqreturn_t handle_twl4030_pih(int irq, void *devid)
> {
> /* Acknowledge, clear *AND* mask the interrupt... */
> - desc->chip->ack(irq);
> - complete(&irq_event);
> -}
> -
> -static struct task_struct *start_twl4030_irq_thread(long irq)
> -{
> - struct task_struct *thread;
> -
> - init_completion(&irq_event);
> - thread = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq, "twl4030-irq");
> - if (!thread)
> - pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %ld thread!\n", irq);
> -
> - return thread;
> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> + complete(devid);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> -
> /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> /*
> @@ -734,18 +717,28 @@ int twl_init_irq(int irq_num, unsigned irq_base, unsigned irq_end)
> }
>
> /* install an irq handler to demultiplex the TWL4030 interrupt */
> - task = start_twl4030_irq_thread(irq_num);
> - if (!task) {
> - pr_err("twl4030: irq thread FAIL\n");
> - status = -ESRCH;
> - goto fail;
> - }
>
> - set_irq_data(irq_num, task);
> - set_irq_chained_handler(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih);
>
> - return status;
> + init_completion(&irq_event);
>
> + status = request_irq(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih, IRQF_DISABLED,
> + "TWL4030-PIH", &irq_event);
> + if (status < 0) {
> + pr_err("twl4030: could not claim irq%d: %d\n", irq_num, status);
> + goto fail_rqirq;
> + }
> +
> + task = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq_num, "twl4030-irq");
> + if (IS_ERR(task)) {
> + pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %d thread!\n", irq_num);
> + status = PTR_ERR(task);
> + goto fail_kthread;
> + }
> + return status;
> +fail_kthread:
> + free_irq(irq_num, &irq_event);
> +fail_rqirq:
> + /* clean up twl4030_sih_setup */
> fail:
> for (i = irq_base; i < irq_end; i++)
> set_irq_chip_and_handler(i, NULL, NULL);
> --
> 1.5.4.7
>
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 6:00 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: TWL4030 IRQ Santosh Shilimkar
2009-08-01 12:50 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-03 16:36 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2009-08-03 17:23 ` Russell King
2009-08-04 10:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-04 13:30 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-08-04 13:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090803163611.GB28606@sortiz.org \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox