From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Wang Sawsd-A24013 <cqwang@motorola.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP2/3 Avoid GPIO pending irq status been set after irq_disable
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:11:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090805151059.GT7374@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hxi9vl7.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
* Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> [090805 17:36]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the long delay on replying to this one.
>
> Tony, this one has been superceded, and the irq_enable/disable stuff no
> longer is needed due to the patch
>
> OMAP: GPIO: clear/restore level/edge detect settings on mask/unmask
>
> from my PM fixes queue.
>
> An updated version (currently in the PM branch) is here:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=commit;h=c80a909697ad931ffad9d30ed321469fa699b208
OK, thanks.
>
> but...
>
<snip>
> > To me it looks like the right way to deal with the level gpio
> > would be to change it temporarily to be edge for the duration of
> > idle, then change it back to be level after returning from idle.
>
> Not sure about that. That would have to be experimented with to
> see if there are any other side effects.
>
> In any case, that kind of change would be independent of this change
> as this change just fixes a bug so wake-enables are only set on
> edge-triggered GPIOs.
OK. Just FYI, I think I experimented on that for 2420 at some point
and it worked, but that was several years ago.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-01 23:24 [PATCH] OMAP2/3 Avoid GPIO pending irq status been set after irq_disable Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-08-05 12:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-05 14:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-05 15:11 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-01 23:49 Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-06-02 15:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-02 17:18 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-06-03 1:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-03 22:02 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-06-04 17:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-04 17:43 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
[not found] <B00E06E2766C2744B022DE9BAF3C59D5372B95@zmy16exm69.ds.mot.com>
2009-06-04 21:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-04 21:58 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-06-04 23:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-05 19:06 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
2009-06-05 21:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-06-05 23:57 ` Wang Sawsd-A24013
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090805151059.GT7374@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=cqwang@motorola.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox