From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: N8x0 to mainline patches Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:04:56 +0300 Message-ID: <20090807070453.GS2358@atomide.com> References: <87zlb95dwx.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <20090713060354.GJ6589@nokia.com> <87vdlx5b3y.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <20090713065341.GC16778@nokia.com> <20090806071038.GE7374@atomide.com> <87y6pwnc9t.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:62391 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755527AbZHGHFF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 03:05:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y6pwnc9t.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: Felipe Balbi , Max Filippov , Jarkko Nikula , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" * Kalle Valo [090806 19:23]: > Tony Lindgren writes: > > > Hey, nice job cleaning up the n8x0 board support! Let's get those into > > l-o master and queued up for the next merge window. (Except for the > > hacks that is). > > What did you think of the file layout? I decided to go with one file > approach (against your advice, sorry) because I didn't see any benefit > from having separate files. Your one file approach looks good to me. Tony