From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"khilman@deeprootsystems.com" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"david-b@pacbell.net" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"sameo@openedhand.com" <sameo@openedhand.com>,
"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
"timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com" <timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com>,
"ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:00:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090816235959.GC4266@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940432B7A0B6@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Hi Balaji,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:30:24PM +0530, Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can I have your comments on this so that I can rebase the patch for the upcoming merge window.
>
I looked at the mfd related files, from patchwork.kernel.org.
A few comments:
* Besides making it look nicer, is there any other reason to change the
twl4030-core.c name ?
* You should also change drivers/mfd/Kconfig to reflect the more generic twl
support.
* in drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:
- status = twl_init_irq(client->irq, pdata->irq_base, pdata->irq_end);
+ status = twl_init_irq(client->irq, pdata->irq_base,
+ pdata->irq_end);
Please remove it as it's unrelated to this patchset.
* Same for the
- ( (devgrp) << 13 | 1 << 12 | (grp) << 9 | (type2) << 7 \
+ ((devgrp) << 13 | 1 << 12 | (grp) << 9 | (type2) << 7 \
lines from include/linux/i2c/twl4030.h
* Why are you moving twl_init_irq and twl_exit_irq to twl.h ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Thanks and Regards,
> Balaji T K
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:28 PM
> > To: sameo@linux.intel.com
> > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; tony@atomide.com; khilman@deeprootsystems.com;
> > david-b@pacbell.net; Shilimkar, Santosh; Nayak, Rajendra;
> > sameo@openedhand.com; wim@iguana.be; timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com; ben-
> > linux@fluff.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@slimlogic.co.uk;
> > Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
> >
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> > Could you please add your comments on the following patch series.
> >
> > series 1
> > [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030* driver files to enable re-use
> > [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename all twl4030_i2c*.
> > [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ in rtc-twl.c to make it generic rtc
> > [PATCH 4/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ to twl_ in twl-regulator.c to make it
> > generic reg
> >
> > series 2 dependent on series 1
> > [RFC][PATCH v2 4/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Update TWL mfd driver to create twl6030
> > regulators
> > [RFC][PATCH v2 3/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 regulators
> > [RFC][PATCH v2 2/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 RTC
> > [RFC][PATCH v2 1/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 irq framework
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Balaji T K
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:04 PM
> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; tony@atomide.com;
> > > khilman@deeprootsystems.com; david-b@pacbell.net; Shilimkar, Santosh; Nayak,
> > > Rajendra; sameo@openedhand.com; wim@iguana.be; timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com;
> > ben-
> > > linux@fluff.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
> > > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
> > >
> > > The upcoming TWL6030 is companion chip for OMAP4 like the current TWL4030
> > > for OMAP3. This patch series adds support for TWL6030 irq framework, and
> > > driver support for RTC and regulator.
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c files is newly added as INTERRUPT status
> > > registers, ack and clear mechanism has changed from twl4030,5030.
> > > drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c will support twl4030,twl5030, and also twl6030 rtc
> > > drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c will support twl regulators.
> > > include/linux/i2c/twl.h will have TWL4030 and TWL6030 offsets selected
> > > at compile time by CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE / CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE
> > >
> > > These patches are generated against mainline 2.6.31-rc1 and has dependancy
> > on
> > > my 1st series[1].
> > > Patch list:
> > > [RFC][PATCH 1/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 irq framework
> > > [RFC][PATCH 2/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 RTC
> > > [RFC][PATCH 3/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 regulators
> > > [RFC][PATCH 4/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Update TWL mfd driver to create twl6030
> > > regulators
> > >
> > > Needed board-* changes and defconfig changes will be done later.Please let
> > me
> > > know your feedback/suggestion on this patch series.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Balaji T K
> > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=124757921417187&w=2
> > > [PATCH 0/4] TWL patch series
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-16 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 13:34 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-06 8:58 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-11 13:00 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17 0:00 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2009-08-17 5:16 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17 9:14 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-08-17 9:42 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-20 11:59 Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-20 12:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-07-20 12:15 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-20 13:00 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-24 4:16 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-07-24 9:20 ` Mark Brown
2009-08-03 6:15 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-03 14:25 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090816235959.GC4266@sortiz.org \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@openedhand.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox