public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"khilman@deeprootsystems.com" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	"david-b@pacbell.net" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
	"sameo@openedhand.com" <sameo@openedhand.com>,
	"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
	"timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com" <timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com>,
	"ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
	<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	"me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:14:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090817091453.GB3228@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940432B7A87B@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:46:55AM +0530, Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Samuel Ortiz [mailto:sameo@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:30 AM
> > To: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; tony@atomide.com; khilman@deeprootsystems.com;
> > david-b@pacbell.net; Shilimkar, Santosh; Nayak, Rajendra;
> > sameo@openedhand.com; wim@iguana.be; timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com; ben-
> > linux@fluff.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@slimlogic.co.uk;
> > me@felipebalbi.com
> > Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
> > 
> > Hi Balaji,
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:30:24PM +0530, Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Can I have your comments on this so that I can rebase the patch for the
> > upcoming merge window.
> > >
> > I looked at the mfd related files, from patchwork.kernel.org.
> > A few comments:
> > 
> > * Besides making it look nicer, is there any other reason to change the
> > twl4030-core.c name ?
> twl-core.c will have common code.  twl4030-irq.c will have code specific for 
> "TWL4030 family" and twl6030-irq.c will have specific code for TWL6030
> family.
Ok, I'm fine with renaming then.

> This is to make code easily readable and it wont be misleading.
> > * You should also change drivers/mfd/Kconfig to reflect the more generic twl
> > support.
> > 
> Added TWL6030 family to it, 
> tps659x0 can be added if needed.
It's up to you. Your Kconfig entry should be exhaustive as far as supported HW
goes.


> > * in drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:
> > -		status = twl_init_irq(client->irq, pdata->irq_base, pdata-
> > >irq_end);
> > +		status = twl_init_irq(client->irq, pdata->irq_base,
> > +			 pdata->irq_end);
> > 
> > Please remove it as it's unrelated to this patchset.
> > 
> Ok 
> > * Same for the
> > -	( (devgrp) << 13 | 1 << 12 | (grp) << 9 | (type2) << 7 \
> > +	((devgrp) << 13 | 1 << 12 | (grp) << 9 | (type2) << 7 \
> > 
> > lines from include/linux/i2c/twl4030.h
> > 
> Ok
> > * Why are you moving twl_init_irq and twl_exit_irq to twl.h ?
> > 
> twl_init_irq and twl_exit_irq is defined in twl4030-irq.c and called from 
> twl-core.c.  Earlier twl4030-core.c had declaration too.
You're now exporting those 2 routines from a include/linux/ header, and I
still dont understand why.

Cheers,
Samuel.


> > Cheers,
> > Samuel.
> > 
> > 
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Balaji T K
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:28 PM
> > > > To: sameo@linux.intel.com
> > > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; tony@atomide.com;
> > khilman@deeprootsystems.com;
> > > > david-b@pacbell.net; Shilimkar, Santosh; Nayak, Rajendra;
> > > > sameo@openedhand.com; wim@iguana.be; timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com; ben-
> > > > linux@fluff.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@slimlogic.co.uk;
> > > > Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > > > Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
> > > >
> > > > Hi Samuel,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please add your comments on the following patch series.
> > > >
> > > > series 1
> > > > [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030* driver files to enable re-use
> > > > [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename all twl4030_i2c*.
> > > > [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ in rtc-twl.c to make it generic rtc
> > > > [PATCH 4/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ to twl_ in twl-regulator.c to make
> > it
> > > > generic reg
> > > >
> > > > series 2 dependent on series 1
> > > > [RFC][PATCH v2 4/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Update TWL mfd driver to create twl6030
> > > > regulators
> > > > [RFC][PATCH v2 3/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 regulators
> > > > [RFC][PATCH v2 2/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 RTC
> > > > [RFC][PATCH v2 1/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 irq framework
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > Balaji T K
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> > > > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:04 PM
> > > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> > tony@atomide.com;
> > > > > khilman@deeprootsystems.com; david-b@pacbell.net; Shilimkar, Santosh;
> > Nayak,
> > > > > Rajendra; sameo@openedhand.com; wim@iguana.be;
> > timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com;
> > > > ben-
> > > > > linux@fluff.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com;
> > lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
> > > > > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series
> > > > >
> > > > > The upcoming TWL6030 is companion chip for OMAP4 like the current
> > TWL4030
> > > > > for OMAP3. This patch series adds support for TWL6030 irq framework, and
> > > > > driver support for RTC and regulator.
> > > > >
> > > > > 	drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c  files is newly added as INTERRUPT
> > status
> > > > > 		registers, ack and clear mechanism has changed from
> > twl4030,5030.
> > > > > 	drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c will support twl4030,twl5030, and also
> > twl6030 rtc
> > > > > 	drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c will support twl regulators.
> > > > > 	include/linux/i2c/twl.h  will have TWL4030 and TWL6030 offsets
> > selected
> > > > > 		at compile time by CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE / CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE
> > > > >
> > > > > These patches are generated against mainline 2.6.31-rc1 and has
> > dependancy
> > > > on
> > > > > my 1st series[1].
> > > > > Patch list:
> > > > > 	[RFC][PATCH 1/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 irq
> > framework
> > > > > 	[RFC][PATCH 2/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 RTC
> > > > > 	[RFC][PATCH 3/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 regulators
> > > > > 	[RFC][PATCH 4/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Update TWL mfd driver to create
> > twl6030
> > > > > regulators
> > > > >
> > > > > Needed board-* changes and defconfig changes will be done later.Please
> > let
> > > > me
> > > > > know your feedback/suggestion on this patch series.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > > Balaji T K
> > > > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=124757921417187&w=2
> > > > >   [PATCH 0/4] TWL patch series
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> > http://oss.intel.com/
> 

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-17  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-20 13:34 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] TWL6030 patch series Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-06  8:58 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-11 13:00   ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17  0:00     ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-08-17  5:16       ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-08-17  9:14         ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2009-08-17  9:42           ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-20 11:59 Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-20 12:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-07-20 12:15   ` Mark Brown
2009-07-20 13:00     ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-07-24  4:16     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-07-24  9:20       ` Mark Brown
2009-08-03  6:15         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-03 14:25           ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090817091453.GB3228@sortiz.org \
    --to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=balajitk@ti.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=sameo@openedhand.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=timo.t.kokkonen@nokia.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox