From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/3 v2] ARM: OMAP: DMA: Add support for DMA channel self linking on OMAP1510 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:49:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20090823184943.GA6994@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <200908101050.02530.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <200908231945.40187.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <20090823180543.GA6167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <200908232038.05593.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:48293 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933623AbZHWStm (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:49:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908232038.05593.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: Tony Lindgren , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Peter Ujfalusi , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Jarkko Nikula On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 08:38:05PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Sunday 23 August 2009 20:05:43 Mark Brown wrote: > > then what are the other > > patches that depend on this? Nobody reported any issues in testing with > > the other OMAP patches. > Dependency on patch 1/3 is not compile time, but run time, and OMAP1510 > specific, that's probably why nobody has reported any issues. OK, given that and the fact that you're reporting that none of these files are afected by any of the other patches it sounds like it'd be better to keep it in the OMAP tree unless Tony says otherwse.