From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
Cc: "ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto" <saaguirre@ti.com>,
"Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <imre.deak@nokia.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] omapfb: Condition mutex acquisition
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:53:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930005310.GI16865@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254236004.23991.17.camel@tubuntu>
* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com> [090929 07:54]:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:34 +0200, ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
> wrote:
> > From: Tomi Valkeinen [tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:22 AM
> > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:14 +0200, ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@ti.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acquiring mutex before framebuffer registration doesn't make sense,
> > > > As there's no danger of external access to the memory related fields.
> > >
> > > What problem does this patch solve? It makes the code more complex.
> > >
> >
> > Tomi,
> >
> > Thanks for your time.
> >
> > The problem was that, during platform driver registration,
> > this sequence was executed:
> >
> > -> omapfb_probe
> > -> omapfb_do_probe
> > -> planes_init
> > -> fbinfo_init
> > -> set_fb_fix
> > ...
> > -> register_framebuffer
> >
> > And then, inside that function, an attempt of acquiring a
> > mutex failed, because it wasn't initialized before trying it:
> >
> > mutex_lock(&fbi->mm_lock);
> >
> > It is actually initialized later in omapfb_do_probe in register_framebuffer call.
> >
> > So, how is the best to solve this then?
>
> Oh, I wasn't implying that there's something wrong with the fix, I just
> didn't know what it was fixing =).
>
> Looks like a valid fix to me.
Tomi & Imre, do you want me to add this to the omap-fixes queue,
or are you planning to send other fixes too?
If you want me to add it, please reply with your ack.
I'll added it into omap-fixes-testing branch for now so we can
get the omaps booted.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 14:14 [RFC][PATCH] omapfb: Condition mutex acquisition Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-29 14:34 ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:37 ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:43 ` Hunter, Jon
2009-09-29 14:53 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-29 14:56 ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 18:26 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2009-09-30 8:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-30 0:53 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2009-09-30 8:35 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-30 12:08 ` Imre Deak
2009-09-30 13:34 ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-30 15:34 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090930005310.GI16865@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=imre.deak@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saaguirre@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox