From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] twl4030 power support for 3430SDP
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:17:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002051742.GZ32041@smtp.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wfubt2a.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
On 09 Oct 01, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@canonical.com> writes:
>
> > On 09 Oct 01, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> I've been carrying these in the PM branch, but now that twl4030 power
> >> support is in mainline, these can be queued for 2.6.33.
> >>
> >> Kevin Hilman (1):
> >> OMAP3: PM: 3430SDP: add initial twl4030 power scripts
> >>
> >> Rajendra Nayak (1):
> >> OMAP3: PM: 3430SDP: Update twl4030 power scripts and device groups
> >>
> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > Do you want to wait until I push patches that modify the way the scripts are
> > loaded in memory? (they now allow overlapping scripts to work around space
> > constraints)
> >
> > Also we now have very simplified scripts that use broadcast messages. These
> > might still need to be tweaked for the various boards though. It works on the
> > RX51.
>
> Well, I don't *want* to wait because that means I would have to rework
> these patches. :)
>
> But it sounds waiting is the right thing. How close are you to having
> the new scripting stuff ready? Should we put it into the PM branch in
> the meantime so it can get some testing on other boards than RX51?
I haven't started looking at it yet. It will have to wait until w42 though.
I guess you can push your patches to the PM branch and revert them at a later
time when I have the changes ready?
/Amit
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Developer, Verdurent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 18:54 [PATCH 0/2] twl4030 power support for 3430SDP Kevin Hilman
2009-10-01 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: PM: 3430SDP: add initial twl4030 power scripts Kevin Hilman
2009-10-01 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: PM: 3430SDP: Update twl4030 power scripts and device groups Kevin Hilman
2009-10-01 19:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] twl4030 power support for 3430SDP Amit Kucheria
2009-10-01 23:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-10-02 5:17 ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2009-10-02 14:13 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-10-02 14:24 ` Amit Kucheria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002051742.GZ32041@smtp.gmail.com \
--to=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox