* [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
@ 2009-10-22 17:38 Madhusudhan Chikkature
2009-10-22 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Madhusudhan Chikkature @ 2009-10-22 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tony, linux-omap
>From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition and
mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
}
}
- if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
+ if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
if (controller_nr == 0) {
omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
@@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct omap_mmc_platform_data
**mmc_data,
irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
break;
case 2:
- if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
+ if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
+ && !cpu_is_omap3630())
return;
base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
--
1.6.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-22 17:38 [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks Madhusudhan Chikkature
@ 2009-10-22 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-10-22 19:12 ` Madhusudhan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2009-10-22 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Madhusudhan Chikkature; +Cc: linux-omap
* Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
> From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
>
> Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition and
> mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> }
> }
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> if (controller_nr == 0) {
> omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
Regards,
Tony
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct omap_mmc_platform_data
> **mmc_data,
> irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> break;
> case 2:
> - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
> + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
> return;
> base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> --
> 1.6.0.4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-22 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2009-10-22 19:12 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-22 19:36 ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-10-23 0:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Madhusudhan @ 2009-10-22 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tony Lindgren'; +Cc: linux-omap
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM
> To: Madhusudhan Chikkature
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
>
> * Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
> > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
> >
> > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition
> and
> > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/devices.c
> > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> > if (controller_nr == 0) {
> > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
>
> How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
Yes. That makes sense. I will submit V2.
Regards,
Madhu
> > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct
> omap_mmc_platform_data
> > **mmc_data,
> > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> > break;
> > case 2:
> > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
> > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> > + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
> > return;
> > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> > --
> > 1.6.0.4
> >
> >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-22 19:12 ` Madhusudhan
@ 2009-10-22 19:36 ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-10-22 19:55 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-23 0:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Menon, Nishanth @ 2009-10-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan, 'Tony Lindgren'
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:13 PM
>
> > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM
> >
> > * Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
> > > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
> > >
> > > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition
> > and
> > > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> > omap2/devices.c
> > > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> > > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> > > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> > > if (controller_nr == 0) {
> > > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> > > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
> >
> > How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tony
> >
> Yes. That makes sense. I will submit V2.
>
> Regards,
> Madhu
>
> > > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct
> > omap_mmc_platform_data
> > > **mmc_data,
> > > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> > > break;
> > > case 2:
> > > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
> > > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> > > + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
!cpu_is_omap3630() is redundant here.. please consider for your v2.
> > > return;
> > > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> > > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> > > --
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-22 19:36 ` Menon, Nishanth
@ 2009-10-22 19:55 ` Madhusudhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Madhusudhan @ 2009-10-22 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Menon, Nishanth', 'Tony Lindgren'; +Cc: linux-omap
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Menon, Nishanth [mailto:nm@ti.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:37 PM
> To: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; 'Tony Lindgren'
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
>
> > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan
> > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:13 PM
> >
> > > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM
> > >
> > > * Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
> > > > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> > > > From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > > > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
> > > >
> > > > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3
> addition
> > > and
> > > > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> > > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> > > omap2/devices.c
> > > > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> > > > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> > > > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> > > > if (controller_nr == 0) {
> > > > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> > > > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
> > >
> > > How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future
> proof.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > Yes. That makes sense. I will submit V2.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Madhu
> >
> > > > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct
> > > omap_mmc_platform_data
> > > > **mmc_data,
> > > > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> > > > break;
> > > > case 2:
> > > > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() &&
!cpu_is_omap34xx())
> > > > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> > > > + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
> !cpu_is_omap3630() is redundant here.. please consider for your v2.
>
Yes. I have taken care of that in V2.
Regards,
Madhu
> > > > return;
> > > > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> > > > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> > > > --
>
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-22 19:12 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-22 19:36 ` Menon, Nishanth
@ 2009-10-23 0:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
2009-10-23 17:13 ` Madhusudhan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pandita, Vikram @ 2009-10-23 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan, 'Tony Lindgren'
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Madhu/Tony
>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan
>> From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM
>> To: Madhusudhan Chikkature
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
>>
>> * Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
>> > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
>> > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
>> >
>> > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition
>> and
>> > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
>> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
>> omap2/devices.c
>> > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>> > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
>> > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
>> > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
Not needed.
For 34xx:
cpu_is_omap3430() returns True
cpu_is_omap3630() returns False
For 3630:
cpu_is_omap3430() returns True
cpu_is_omap3630() returns True
So no need to add an orring for 3630, as 3630 is treated just like a 34xx.
>> > if (controller_nr == 0) {
>> > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
>> > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
>>
>> How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tony
>>
>Yes. That makes sense. I will submit V2.
>
>Regards,
>Madhu
>
>> > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct
>> omap_mmc_platform_data
>> > **mmc_data,
>> > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
>> > break;
>> > case 2:
>> > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
>> > + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
>> > return;
>> > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
>> > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
>> > --
>> > 1.6.0.4
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
2009-10-23 0:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
@ 2009-10-23 17:13 ` Madhusudhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Madhusudhan @ 2009-10-23 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Pandita, Vikram', 'Tony Lindgren'; +Cc: linux-omap
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pandita, Vikram [mailto:vikram.pandita@ti.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 7:08 PM
> To: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; 'Tony Lindgren'
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
>
> Madhu/Tony
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> >Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan
> >> From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM
> >> To: Madhusudhan Chikkature
> >> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks
> >>
> >> * Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> [091022 10:38]:
> >> > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> >> > From: Madhu <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> >> > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> >> > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
> >> >
> >> > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition
> >> and
> >> > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> >> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> >> omap2/devices.c
> >> > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> >> > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> >> > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> >> > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
>
> Not needed.
> For 34xx:
> cpu_is_omap3430() returns True
> cpu_is_omap3630() returns False
>
> For 3630:
> cpu_is_omap3430() returns True
> cpu_is_omap3630() returns True
>
> So no need to add an orring for 3630, as 3630 is treated just like a 34xx.
>
Hi Vikram,
I have already posted V2 of this patch which uses cpu_is_omap34xx() and that
should be right way.
Regards,
Madhu
>
>
> >> > if (controller_nr == 0) {
> >> > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> >> > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
> >>
> >> How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >Yes. That makes sense. I will submit V2.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Madhu
> >
> >> > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct
> >> omap_mmc_platform_data
> >> > **mmc_data,
> >> > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> >> > break;
> >> > case 2:
> >> > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() &&
!cpu_is_omap34xx())
> >> > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> >> > + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
> >> > return;
> >> > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> >> > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> >> > --
> >> > 1.6.0.4
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-23 17:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-22 17:38 [PATCH]Omap3630: Add hsmmc related checks Madhusudhan Chikkature
2009-10-22 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-10-22 19:12 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-22 19:36 ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-10-22 19:55 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-23 0:08 ` Pandita, Vikram
2009-10-23 17:13 ` Madhusudhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox