From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Regulator: Renaming the supplies used in MMC driver Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:12:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20091106151204.GD27699@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1257439189-29594-1-git-send-email-anuj.aggarwal@ti.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030A67E302@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:45691 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757587AbZKFPMA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:12:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030A67E302@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Aggarwal, Anuj" Cc: Mike Rapoport , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 11:21:14AM +0530, Aggarwal, Anuj wrote: > [Aggarwal, Anuj] This was done to have the same naming conventions across > the board. I could not find an extra "v" in supply names except MMC. > Hence modified this. Regulator supply names should be simple and easy to > understand. > I can revert this change or change the dependent board files for SDP/LDP > etc. What do you suggest? These names normally come from the names of the supplies in the datasheets for the consumer devices rather than the names of the rails on the boards - those would normally be specified as the names in the constraints where they are used for display purposes.