From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
"p_gortmaker@yahoo.com" <p_gortmaker@yahoo.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] TWL patch series
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:40:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091209174035.GB6051@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940437210696@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Hi Balaji,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:09:33AM +0530, Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> This patch is not merged. Please let me know if I am missing something
> so that i can post the patches rebased on the latest 2.6.32.
I'd appreciate if you could rebase your patches, and also address Amit's
concern on patch #3.
I'll merge these patches then.
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Thanks and Regards,
> Balaji T K
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
> > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 5:35 PM
> > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T; Shilimkar, Santosh; Nayak, Rajendra;
> > a.zummo@towertech.it; p_gortmaker@yahoo.com; sameo@linux.intel.com;
> > tony@atomide.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] TWL patch series
> >
> > This patch series v3 incorporates comments received earlier[1].
> >
> > The upcoming TWL6030 is companion chip for OMAP4 like the current TWL4030
> > for OMAP3. The common modules like RTC, Regulator creates opportunity
> > to re-use the most of the code from twl4030.
> >
> > [PATCH v3 01/04] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030* driver files to enable re-
> > use
> > [PATCH v3 02/04] ARM: OMAP: Rename all twl4030_i2c*.
> > [PATCH v3 03/04] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ in rtc-twl.c to make it
> > generic rtc
> > [PATCH v3 04/04] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030_ to twl_ in twl-regulator.c
> > to
> > make it generic reg
> >
> > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=124757921417187&w=2
> > [PATCH 0/4] TWL patch series
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 12:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] TWL patch series Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-12-09 5:39 ` Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T
2009-12-09 17:40 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091209174035.GB6051@sortiz.org \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox