* [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
@ 2009-12-08 14:16 Tero Kristo
2009-12-09 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tero Kristo @ 2009-12-08 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap
From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 10 +---------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
index be3a1da..db228b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
@@ -675,13 +675,8 @@ void sr_start_vddautocomap(int srid, u32 target_opp_no)
sr_configure(sr);
}
- if (sr->is_autocomp_active == 1)
- pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is already active\n",
- srid);
-
sr->is_autocomp_active = 1;
if (!sr_enable(sr, target_opp_no)) {
- pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp not activated\n", srid);
sr->is_autocomp_active = 0;
if (sr->is_sr_reset == 1)
sr_clk_disable(sr);
@@ -707,11 +702,8 @@ int sr_stop_vddautocomap(int srid)
/* Reset the volatage for current OPP */
sr_reset_voltage(srid);
return true;
- } else {
- pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is not active\n",
- srid);
+ } else
return false;
- }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sr_stop_vddautocomap);
--
1.5.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
2009-12-08 14:16 [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam Tero Kristo
@ 2009-12-09 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-09 23:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-09 23:23 ` Felipe Balbi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2009-12-09 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tero Kristo; +Cc: linux-omap
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>
> Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
> if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
Agreed that these warnings are spam, but I think they should be
replaced by some one-time warning so at least there's a hint someplace
that SR is not actually being done on a platfrom.
Kevin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 10 +---------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> index be3a1da..db228b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> @@ -675,13 +675,8 @@ void sr_start_vddautocomap(int srid, u32 target_opp_no)
> sr_configure(sr);
> }
>
> - if (sr->is_autocomp_active == 1)
> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is already active\n",
> - srid);
> -
> sr->is_autocomp_active = 1;
> if (!sr_enable(sr, target_opp_no)) {
> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp not activated\n", srid);
> sr->is_autocomp_active = 0;
> if (sr->is_sr_reset == 1)
> sr_clk_disable(sr);
> @@ -707,11 +702,8 @@ int sr_stop_vddautocomap(int srid)
> /* Reset the volatage for current OPP */
> sr_reset_voltage(srid);
> return true;
> - } else {
> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is not active\n",
> - srid);
> + } else
> return false;
> - }
>
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sr_stop_vddautocomap);
> --
> 1.5.4.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
2009-12-09 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2009-12-09 23:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-09 23:23 ` Felipe Balbi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2009-12-09 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Hilman; +Cc: Tero Kristo, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/09/2009 05:15 PM, the following:
> Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
>
>> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>>
>> Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
>> if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>
> Agreed that these warnings are spam, but I think they should be
> replaced by some one-time warning so at least there's a hint someplace
> that SR is not actually being done on a platfrom.
is'nt that already taken care?
echo -n 1 >/sys/power/vdd1_autocomp; echo $?
should return a non 0 value if it was not set, else should set 0 if it
went ok.
if someone wants to verify the state, it should be a cat
/sys/power/vdd1_autocomp to know if autocomp was set or not.
For some userspace to know if autocomp was set or not (if I understand
your intention) should look at return value like normal linux commands.
>
> Kevin
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 10 +---------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> index be3a1da..db228b2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> @@ -675,13 +675,8 @@ void sr_start_vddautocomap(int srid, u32 target_opp_no)
>> sr_configure(sr);
>> }
>>
>> - if (sr->is_autocomp_active == 1)
>> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is already active\n",
>> - srid);
>> -
>> sr->is_autocomp_active = 1;
>> if (!sr_enable(sr, target_opp_no)) {
>> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp not activated\n", srid);
>> sr->is_autocomp_active = 0;
>> if (sr->is_sr_reset == 1)
>> sr_clk_disable(sr);
>> @@ -707,11 +702,8 @@ int sr_stop_vddautocomap(int srid)
>> /* Reset the volatage for current OPP */
>> sr_reset_voltage(srid);
>> return true;
>> - } else {
>> - pr_warning("SR%d: VDD autocomp is not active\n",
>> - srid);
>> + } else
>> return false;
>> - }
>>
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sr_stop_vddautocomap);
>> --
>> 1.5.4.3
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
2009-12-09 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-09 23:21 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2009-12-09 23:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-12-09 23:47 ` Nishanth Menon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2009-12-09 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ext Kevin Hilman
Cc: Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere), linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:15:26AM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
>Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
>
>> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>>
>> Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
>> if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>
>Agreed that these warnings are spam, but I think they should be
>replaced by some one-time warning so at least there's a hint someplace
>that SR is not actually being done on a platfrom.
well, there's printk_once()
include/linux/kernel.h:
250 /*
251 * Print a one-time message (analogous to WARN_ONCE() et al):
252 */
253 #define printk_once(x...) ({ \
254 static bool __print_once = true; \
255 \
256 if (__print_once) { \
257 __print_once = false; \
258 printk(x); \
259 } \
260 })
and WARN_ONCE()
include/asm-generic/bug.h:
125 #define WARN_ONCE(condition, format...) ({ \
126 static int __warned; \
127 int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
128 \
129 if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
130 if (WARN(!__warned, format)) \
131 __warned = 1; \
132 unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
133 })
I guess printk_once() is better.
--
balbi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
2009-12-09 23:23 ` Felipe Balbi
@ 2009-12-09 23:47 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-09 23:51 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2009-12-09 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com
Cc: ext Kevin Hilman, Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere),
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Felipe Balbi had written, on 12/09/2009 05:23 PM, the following:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:15:26AM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>>>
>>> Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
>>> if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>> Agreed that these warnings are spam, but I think they should be
>> replaced by some one-time warning so at least there's a hint someplace
>> that SR is not actually being done on a platfrom.
>
> well, there's printk_once()
>
> include/linux/kernel.h:
>
> 250 /*
> 251 * Print a one-time message (analogous to WARN_ONCE() et al):
> 252 */
> 253 #define printk_once(x...) ({ \
> 254 static bool __print_once = true; \
> 255 \
> 256 if (__print_once) { \
> 257 __print_once = false; \
> 258 printk(x); \
> 259 } \
> 260 })
>
> and WARN_ONCE()
>
> include/asm-generic/bug.h:
>
> 125 #define WARN_ONCE(condition, format...) ({ \
> 126 static int __warned; \
> 127 int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
> 128 \
> 129 if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
> 130 if (WARN(!__warned, format)) \
> 131 __warned = 1; \
> 132 unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
> 133 })
>
> I guess printk_once() is better.
>
But what is the point in having it?
situation 1:
sr_start_vddautocomap() gets called for starting AVS while dvfs. The
spam message just warns user that autocomp is not set when OPP change
happens.
case 1 against printing it:
If the user had disabled vddautocomp, then the warnings have no rational
in warning the user which he/she already knows about.
case 2 against printing it using printk_once:
situation x:
step 1: autocomp disabled, dvfs transitions -> printk_once will print
only once.
step 2: autocomp enabled, dvfs transitions - no prints.
step 3: autocomp disabled, dvfs - we wont see prints :(
Agreed, we could have an equivalent implementation using a static bool
instead of using printk_once .. still a nuisance message which does not
provide additional info.. other than adding a latency overhead.
situation 2:
when attempting to enable SR when nvalues are not present (e.g. on
3530/3430 es3.0).. here the return value should be used and is more
informative and usable from a application perspective..
just my 2 cents..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam
2009-12-09 23:47 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2009-12-09 23:51 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2009-12-09 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere),
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
> Felipe Balbi had written, on 12/09/2009 05:23 PM, the following:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:15:26AM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Current warning messages will be constantly printed out during normal operation
>>>> if smartreflex autocompensation is disabled.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>>> Agreed that these warnings are spam, but I think they should be
>>> replaced by some one-time warning so at least there's a hint someplace
>>> that SR is not actually being done on a platfrom.
>>
>> well, there's printk_once()
>>
>> include/linux/kernel.h:
>>
>> 250 /* 251 * Print a one-time message (analogous to
>> WARN_ONCE() et al):
>> 252 */ 253 #define printk_once(x...) ({
>> \
>> 254 static bool __print_once = true; \
>> 255 \
>> 256 if (__print_once) { \
>> 257 __print_once = false; \
>> 258 printk(x); \
>> 259 } \
>> 260 })
>>
>> and WARN_ONCE()
>>
>> include/asm-generic/bug.h:
>>
>> 125 #define WARN_ONCE(condition, format...) ({ \
>> 126 static int __warned; \
>> 127 int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
>> 128 \
>> 129 if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
>> 130 if (WARN(!__warned, format)) \
>> 131 __warned = 1; \
>> 132 unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
>> 133 })
>>
>> I guess printk_once() is better.
>>
> But what is the point in having it?
> situation 1:
> sr_start_vddautocomap() gets called for starting AVS while dvfs. The
> spam message just warns user that autocomp is not set when OPP change
> happens.
>
> case 1 against printing it:
> If the user had disabled vddautocomp, then the warnings have no
> rational in warning the user which he/she already knows about.
>
> case 2 against printing it using printk_once:
> situation x:
> step 1: autocomp disabled, dvfs transitions -> printk_once will print
> only once.
> step 2: autocomp enabled, dvfs transitions - no prints.
> step 3: autocomp disabled, dvfs - we wont see prints :(
> Agreed, we could have an equivalent implementation using a static bool
> instead of using printk_once .. still a nuisance message which does
> not provide additional info.. other than adding a latency overhead.
>
> situation 2:
> when attempting to enable SR when nvalues are not present (e.g. on
> 3530/3430 es3.0).. here the return value should be used and is more
> informative and usable from a application perspective..
>
> just my 2 cents..
OK, I'm sold.
Applying Tero's original patch.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-09 23:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-08 14:16 [PATCH] Smartreflex: Avoid unnecessary spam Tero Kristo
2009-12-09 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-09 23:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-09 23:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-12-09 23:47 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-09 23:51 ` Kevin Hilman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox